Sky Sportszine, a free magazine for Sky satellite subscribers in the UK, has made something of a blunder in its countdown of the top ten WWE Divas to hold the Women’s Championship — half of the list has never even held a belt.
Five Divas included on the list have yet to hold gold in the WWE, including Eve Torres, Kelly Kelly, Maria, Natalya and Tiffany.
Meanwhile the list only seems to include current WWE Divas with four-time Women’s Champion and one-time Divas Champion, Mickie James taking the top spot.
They just don’t make magazines like they used to!
See the full size spread below.
RSS
Email
Twitter
Tumblr
Facebook
YouTube
29 Comments
I honestly think, they made a mistake, and instead of Women’s Championship it is Women’s Division. I mean, they can’t possibly be that stupid, can’t they? xD
This is a joke…right?
LMAO, that’s hilarious. I agree with Ana_Nattie_rules and they meant to say women’s division, and not women’s championship… it’s pretty funny either way though.
Yeah, surely they meant women’s division. Even then, why would they include Eve and Maria? Perhaps they just meant best looking or something? No, that still doesn’t explain Tiffany…
I’m just perplexed by this list.
I honestly think that they choose the girls like a Top Ten Sexy Divas. We don’t know the taste of the guy who wrote the article…so xD
This is totally off topic but I must know ,,, how do you dlete your Diva-Dirt account? I’m going to get a new account on here but I need to delete this one. How do I do that? =S
Laugh out loud at “Sky Sports casts an appreciative eye over the finest talent to grace the WWE Women’s Championship.” More like a blind eye. I’m a huge Maryse fan and she’s one of the only reasons I tune into this Monday night tripe anymore, but even I can’t go along with her being placed above the likes of Melina and Natalya in terms of talent.
Its not a talent thing B Frizzle, Finest = Hottest…at least I want to believe so, or the fact that Maria and Tiffany are in the list, is just weird.
This will be my chuckle of the day…until the Krissy Vaine Project of course.
That’s what I’m saying. Even as a Maryse fan I can’t pretent its based on talent.
Just a half-assed attempt to get the Divas in the magazine. If they knew two things about the company this wouldn’t have gone to print. I mean, even if they meant to say “division” instead of “championship”, on what planet is Tiffany in the top 10?
WOW this is really…um…interesting it seem like they just over looked MICHELLE making history But they made sure to mention MARYSE’S playboy spread smh. Is this like a yearly thing because if it is Top 3 should definitely be MELINA,MICHELLE,MICKIE or is this something they just slapped in their for this generation of divas?
Everything outside of a wrestling magazine isn’t based on “wrestling skillz”
Erin wrote:
“on what planet is Tiffany in the top 10?”
It looks to be the 10 divas that are most seen on tv, which includes Tiffany.
Mikas: It can’t be the 10 divas most seen, because last year some names of the list didn’t appear for several weeks/months. If it was the most seen ones, they would have put the Bellas instead of Eve, for example.
Okay I can understand if they did a typo on Maria & Kelly Kelly & Eve…. but Tiffany ?.
Lmao the only top ten list she should be in is THE WROST THEME SONGS! and she should be #1…and I thought Rosa’s was the wrost but Tiffany blew that one out da water lol.
Yeah I think they ment to say Womens Division. Like what Trish did to Christy Hemme’s Playboy cover when it said WWE Champion. She crossed it out , if i had this magazine and a marker i would cross out Maria , Kelly , Tiffany & Mayrse….and add in Katie , Jillian , Trish & Lita
I actually know the writer, who wrote this up. He asked me (and others he knows) who my top 3 (current) Divas were. I emailed him my results, but once he told me it was finished and i saw the final copy, i was disapointed. Not only has he got the heading wrong, but there is very little about each diva, other than when they debuted.
Dont worry people, he has gotten an earful from me. I will post his reply on here when he gets in touch with me. But then again what do u expect from a guy who only cares for the Divas looks, not there actual Ring talent!
That sounds great ^, you sock it to him haha.
Ohh Beth looks so hot in that photoshoot!! well, not photoshoot… photoshop LOL!
there’s a reason it’s free ;)
they’re magazines are always full of ‘facts’
@Ana_Nattie_rules – I agree. It would include the Bellas and Alicia Fox (maybe…).
@ B Fizzile- your icon is of Lacey Von Erich, all your comments in this post are invalid.
Melanie Reply:
January 24th, 2010 at 2:49 am
Armando, fan wars are lame. Please stop.
this is just disrespectful to all the divas that can actually wrestle and have talent, it is just laughable how they put tiffany in the list, she shouldnt even be mentioned in the same sentence as the womens championship, and if she EVER held the championship, even if it was like a jillian title reighn then, id seriously, give up on wwe 100%
Because the Maryse fan has so much room to talk. Now please, stay on topic.
hmmm no gail jillian katie and alicia but tiffany maria kelly maryse and eve made the list?? this is really messed up!!!
This may be inappropriate but LMMFGDAO @That list no further comments i have something to LOL@ when i need a good laugh.
LOL at the rankings.
Gail Kim?
Hey fellow Diva fans!
If u look at my previous post i said that i knew the writer of this , and he has gotten in touch with me.
He said that i was sky sports who made the mistake on the heading and he has informed them off this. He also said that he wrote 5 to 6 lines on each Diva, but it was sky sports (again) who mucked up. I also told him that some fans were not happy with the rankings and explained to me the reason for this. He asked at lease 25 to 30 people(including me) on who they thought there top 5 (current) divas were. When he got all the info, he made a top 10 list based on what the fans (he had asked) thought. My top 5 were Mickie, Melina, Natalya , Maryse and Gail Kim. So he does say sorry. So dont blame my friend for the mistake that Sky Sports made.
I will try and see if i can get my hands on the orangail article that my friend wrote up, and will post it on here.